AI Prompt Guide

Structure Beats Words in AI Prompting For many people, prompting AI feels like writing poetry. The instinct is understandable: more adjectives, more emotion, more detail must mean better results—right? So prompts grow longer. Descriptions get more cinematic. The words start to sound impressive. And yet, the results become less predictable , not more. This isn’t because AI is bad. It’s because AI doesn’t work the way humans expect. The Myth: “Longer Prompts = Better Results” Most users assume AI reads prompts the way humans read stories. We don’t. AI does not feel your words. It does not admire your metaphors. It does not intuit your intent. Instead, it parses instructions . When a prompt becomes long, emotional, and descriptive without structure, the model faces a problem: it cannot reliably determine what matters most . The result is output that looks creative—but behaves randomly. The Real Problem: Prompt Poetry “Prompt poetry” is when a prompt: Prioritizes vibes over instructions S...

 Most people think a good AI prompt is about finding the right words . It isn’t. A good prompt is about structure —and structure only reveals itself when you slow down and take it apart. Today, we’re doing exactly that. Not by adding more lines. But by breaking one good prompt down, piece by piece . Why Prompt Dissection Matters When a prompt works, people usually say things like: “Oh, that wording was clever.” “You need to be very detailed.” “Just add more context.” That’s how prompt poetry spreads. The truth is harsher: If you don’t know why a prompt works, you can’t reliably recreate it. So instead of collecting prompts like lucky charms, we dissect them like engineers. Step 1: The Original Prompt (No Editing Allowed) We start with the full prompt exactly as it was used. No polishing. No “improved” version. No rewriting to make it look smart. Why? Because if a prompt only works after you explain it, it didn’t really work. This step establishes the baseline —the raw input that ...